Home / Business / Four-fifths of FM suppliers fear margin erosion due to poor QBRs

Four-fifths of FM suppliers fear margin erosion due to poor QBRs

Eighty per cent of suppliers fear margin erosion due to poor business review practices according to the findings released in a new white paper ‘The QBR Frustration‘ from Clientshare, the company behind business reviews platform, Pulse.

Clientshare states the newly commissioned research proves the urgent need for facilities management, logistics and process outsourcing suppliers to improve their Business Review processes if they want to continue to grow and retain their customer accounts. The findings uncover critical gaps in how these suppliers communicate with key buyers and shows why opportunities for growth are being missed.

Seventy-one per cent of senior stakeholders in supplier businesses point to Quarterly Business Reviews (QBRs) and regular review meetings as their number one opportunity to evidence consistent value and innovation to buyers – and 68 per cent of these buyers agree. Yet the research showed that suppliers are struggling to demonstrate their value in these meetings, with the majority expressing concerns about current review practices. Missing the mark on QBRs can be costly, as a lack of feedback and insights from buyers has led to more than half (54 per cent) of suppliers experiencing unexpected contract loss in the past two years.

Many suppliers report their QBR meetings fail to focus on value and innovation, with just 21 per cent feeling confident that key buyer stakeholders fully understand what they deliver. The impact is significant, as 80 per cent of suppliers fear profit margin erosion if they fail to consistently prove their value, and 67 per cent report being forced into price-driven negotiations at renewal.

James Ward, CEO of Clientshare, described the research as a wake-up call for suppliers. He said: “It’s alarming that only a fifth of respondents are totally confident that they are effectively demonstrating the value and innovation they deliver to buyers. This should be one of the primary objectives of every single review meeting and the foundation for a strong and enduring relationship.”

Ward emphasised the importance of effective and efficient QBRs in driving better business conversations, cross and upselling accounts, and reducing churn.

Adding his insights on the role of QBRs in improving supplier-buyer partnerships, Doug Janikiewicz, Managing Director at CBRE said: “Without doubt, our approach to QBRs helps to build trust with customers and this makes them more open to working more with us. Crucially, customers are now trusting us to take on new types of project work which move our services into capital expenditure as opposed to being an operating cost. And this is hugely positive for our business.”

The whitepaper also features commentary from other industry experts, including Dan Eckett, Client Solutions Group Director – UK&I at SEKO Logistics; Maggy Thorvardardottir, Director of Global Service Management Practice at Ricoh Global Services; and Jason Bendell, Partnership Retention Director at Compass Group. These contributors share their expertise on how a focus on high-quality QBRs builds trust, enhances customer engagement through feedback and provides invaluable insights.

To download the full research click here.

Secure the modern workplace with visitor management 

Elevate your visitor management strategy with Eptura’s Visitor E-Book.

This comprehensive guide from the global worktech company is packed with advanced insights and practical tips on optimising your visitor management systems. Discover how to implement advanced visitor tracking, integrate seamlessly with access control systems, and ensure data protection and compliance.

The e-book also covers essential strategies for emergency management preparedness and adapting your infrastructure for flexible workplaces. Get your e-book today by clicking here and start making a significant impact! 

About Sarah OBeirne

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*