ADVICE & OPINION 
   COMPLIANCE 
 ASBESTOS RISKS REVIEWED 
 In association with 
 Kate Gardner, Health and Safety Trainer at International Workplace  
 on the inquiry launched by the Government into why asbestos related  
 disease is still the UK’s biggest occupational killer www.internationalworkplace.com 
 More than 5,000 deaths a year are recorded  
 from diseases such as mesothelioma, lung  
 cancer and asbestosis – all of which are due to  
 exposure to asbestos. 
 Currently, the duty to manage asbestos is  
 contained in Regulation 4 of the Control of Asbestos  
 Regulations 2012 and requires the ‘duty-holder’ to: 
  Take reasonable steps to find out if there are  
 asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in nondomestic  
 premises, and if so, its amount, where it  
 is and what condition it is in. 
  Presume materials contain asbestos unless there  
 is strong evidence that they do not. 
  Make, and keep up to date, a record of the  
 location and condition of the ACM – or materials  
 presumed to contain asbestos. 
  Provide information on the location and condition  
 of the materials to anyone who is liable to work  
 on or disturb them. 
 GOVERNMENT INQUIRY 
 However, this might soon change as the Work and  
 Pensions Committee recently launched an inquiry  
 into how the HSE manages the continued presence  
 of asbestos in buildings, following the publication of  
 a report by think tank ResPublica.  
 The Committee’s inquiry and call for evidence  will  
 examine the current risks posed by asbestos in the  
 workplace, the actions taken by the HSE to mitigate  
 them, and how its approach compares to those  
 taken in other countries.  
 Rt Hon Stephen Timms MP, Chair of the Work and  
 Pensions Committee, said: “With the UK death rate  
 from asbestos-related illness the highest in the  
 world, there are serious concerns about how the  
 material is being dealt with compared with how it  
 is managed in other countries, such as France. The  
 HSE is rightly looking into how asbestos can be  
 handled more safely and the Committee’s inquiry  
 will help to make sure monitoring and regulations  
 are as e ective and safe as they can possibly be.” 
 RECOMMENDATIONS 
 The report by ResPublica makes the following initial  
 recommendations: 
  The government should bring the health and  
 safety regime for the management of asbestos  
 up to the highest international standards. 
 14    OCTOBER 2021 
  It should establish a central register of all  
 asbestos currently in place in public buildings  
 across the UK (including schools, hospitals and  
 social housing). 
  A cost-benefit analysis for the removal of all  
 asbestos from public buildings in the UK needs  
 to be commissioned.  
  The HSE should revise the current ‘Duty to  
 Manage’.  
  The HSE should amend guidance and risk  
 assessments to take account of early exposure,  
 different levels of ‘in-situ’ risks, and the higher  
 risks posed by Amosite and Crocidolite. 
  The HSE should accurately measure and  
 represent fatality figures and the actual harm  
 caused by asbestos exposure. 
  The HSE should assure (rather than assume)  
 buildings are safe, through the requirement for  
 periodic sensitive air monitoring based upon  
 revised risk and priority assessment.  
  The HSE should improve the regime for  
 reporting the disturbance of asbestos  
 materials. 
  Research funding bodies in the UK should  
 consider the current gaps in academic  
 literature about the risk asbestos-containing  
 materials pose in-situ. 
 The UK Asbestos Training Association (UKATA) has  
 also raised concerns around the lack of asbestos  
 training that has been undertaken since the start of  
 the COVID-19 pandemic. 
 Said Craig Evans, Chief Operating O icer of  
 UKATA: “Our concern is that the fabric of the  
 many workplaces and public buildings that have  
 been closed during the COVID-19 outbreak will  
 have declined. The very people who manage the  
 buildings may have been furloughed and therefore  
 they will not have been inspected for deterioration  
 of any asbestos present. This increases the risk of  
 exposure to deadly asbestos fibres for the buildings’  
 users.” 
 Duty to Manage training is a legal requirement;  
 however, industry figures show the number of  
 workers who have undertaken asbestos training  
 since March has steeply declined and is at its lowest  
 level for five years. 
 ADVICE TO FMS 
 Changes to asbestos guidance and legislation are  
 likely to have significant consequences for duty  
 holders when managing asbestos on their premises.  
 Greater regulation will mean organisations have to  
 demonstrate they have done all that is ‘reasonably  
 practicable’ to avert the risk of exposure to  
 asbestos. Organisations do not have to cause  
 actual harm in order to fall foul of health and safety  
 legislation; the mere creation of a risk of harm is  
 su icient for enforcement action to be taken by  
 the HSE. It’s therefore vital that building managers  
 and appointed persons ensure that their asbestos  
 training is up-to-date. 
 The tricky part is that asbestos-related diseases  
 can take up to 40 years to manifest themselves  
 and therefore it takes a long stretch of time before  
 the asbestos bans start bearing fruit. The latency  
 period of asbestos, coupled with a substantial drop  
 in training, could mean that the UK faces a greater  
 number of deaths from asbestos over the next  
 15-60 years. If you’re a long-running business, past  
 employees could come back to you with claims of  
 asbestos exposure from many years ago.    
 
				
/www.internationalworkplace.com