
 
        
         
		GREEN HOUSE GAS (GHG)  
 PROTOCOL EMISSIONS 
 Scope 1 emissions - direct emissions from owned or controlled sources  
 sXcK as Ɯ eet veKicles, Jas and diesel consXPption and refriJerant Jas  
 leakage. 
 Scope 2 emissions - indirect emissions from the generation of  
 purchased energy and will include primarily electricity, including from  
 certiƛ ed reneZaEle soXrces 
 Scope 3 emissions – all other indirect emissions that occur in a  
 company’s value chain particularly operations and services on client sites. 
 There are 4 key maturity levels for reporting emissions:  
  Reporting just scope 1 & 2 emissions  
  Reporting scope 1-3 emissions, scope  
 3 does not include the supply chain  
  Reporting scope 1-3 emissions, scope  
 3 includes the supply chain  
  Reporting on emissions attributed to FM services as a  
 decarbonisation pathway 
 FOCUS      INTERVIEW 
 a measured decarbonisation that can be  
 applied to the customer.” 
 To help resolve these issues, the SFMI and  
 BAM FM project will set a standard for the  
 industry that will give FMs a rulebook for  
 categorising and measuring the emissions  
 of the services that they deliver, which is  
 based on recognised emissions accounting  
 processes. 
 DEVELOPING THE STANDARDS 
 The partnership between BAM and the SFMI  
 will deliver two key public reports that will  
 set the vision, rules and boundaries for the  
 measurement of carbon within FM services.  
 The reports will deliver one standard split  
 into two. The first report will be a technical  
 document showing how boundaries can be  
 clearly defined when it comes to emissions  
 30    OCTOBER 2021 
 procurement team and contract managers.  
 This will help us obtain information from  
 the coalface on who has responsibility  
 on the di erent types of services  
 within contracts. A handful of other FM  
 providers have also agreed to set up some  
 consultations to ensure we capture a  
 breath of services. We’ll reconvene in a  
 workshop in mid-October and publish the  
 first report in time for COP 26.” 
 One of the main drivers for undertaking  
 this project is to help FM customers. FM  
 suppliers deliver such a vast range of  
 services, there is huge scope for them to  
 make a di erence by reducing the carbon  
 emissions produced in their activities, but  
 to realise this opportunity contracts must  
 give FMs the scope to act. 
 Says Havers: “Ultimately FM suppliers  
 can only do something if a contract enables  
 them to do so.  We hope our project will  
 increase the number of contracts, where  
 FM can take responsibility for Scope 3  
 emissions, as it will provide clients with  
 the confidence that emissions are being  
 identified and measured in a standard and  
 recognised way. Leading to a change in  
 procurement processes for FM services,  
 including greater innovation in FM  
 contracts and a rise in requests for carbon  
 reduction pathways. 
 As Heaton concludes: “COP26 should be  
 a reminder to us all that everyone needs  
 to do their bit to tackle climate change.  
 Our project, will help FMs understand the  
 role they can play on daily basis to reduce  
 carbon on their contracts.” 
 To help resolve these issues, the SFMI and BAM FM  
 project will set a standard for the industry that will  
 give FMs a rulebook for categorising and measuring the  
 emissions of the services that they deliver, which is based  
 on recognised emissions accounting processes.” 
 that result from FM services. This covers  
 three key areas of emissions:  
  Those where FMs can take ownership  
  Those where FMs can take responsibility  
  Those that FMs can influence  
 The second report will be focused on the  
 categorisation process. This includes how  
 you can begin to identity the categories  
 of Scope 3 emissions generated by FM  
 services and the impact these can have on  
 decarbonisation.  
 “Both reports will be peer reviewed to  
 ensure our approach will have industry  
 wide acceptance”, explains Havers. “We’ve  
 already got some industry bodies who have  
 agreed to be critical reviewers: the RICS,  
 UKGBC, IEMA, IWFM and ACE. We’re also  
 going to conduct interviews with the BAM