
 
        
         
		FMJ.CO.UK SMART BUILDINGS      FOCUS 
 NOVEMBER 2019    29 
 sustainable buildings. 
 Furthermore, there are new challenges  
 to face: the growing choice of technological  
 solutions now available on the market,  
 an influx of unstructured data, and the  
 potential for app fatigue.  
 RECOGNISING THE PROBLEM 
 The first step to overcoming these  
 challenges is to accept there is a problem  
 in the first place. With support from a  
 BMS consultant and regular maintenance  
 checks, it is easy to assume a building  
 is operating as e iciently as possible.  
 However, without real operational data, it is  
 di icult to know if this is actually the case.  
 More o en than not, the reality is quite the  
 opposite.  
 For example, the 4D Monitoring energy  
 management platform is responsible for  
 tracking the performance of HVAC systems  
 in over 250 commercial sites nationwide.  
 In 69 per cent of those sites, the system  
 has identified issues with the central plant,  
 including runtime errors and unnecessary  
 24/7 operation. That is a significant number  
 of properties not operating at maximum  
 e iciency, despite rigorous maintenance  
 regimes and regular BMS checks. 
 By assuming there is a problem, facilities  
 managers begin on the front foot. It  
 means they are in a position to proactively  
 identify solutions that will  
 deliver e iciencies. The  
 right application of  
 smart building  
 technology will  
 give facilities  
 managers  
 the data  
 they need  
 to achieve  
 this –  
 and if it  
 transpires  
 that their  
 properties  
 are already  
 operating  
 e iciently, they  
 will have the means to  
 demonstrate it. 
 By assuming buildings are  
 operating ine iciently, even if everything  
 looks fine on the surface, and embracing  
 technology that provides accurate  
 performance data, facilities managers can  
 proactively acquire the visibility needed to  
 create smarter, more sustainable buildings.  
 But what technology should they be  
 looking for? What should be measured? And  
 what should they do with the information  
 once they have it? 
 Facilities managers can focus their  
 attention on many di erent areas,  
 but using technology to analyse the  
 performance of the central plant is a  
 cost-e ective way to improve operational  
 e iciency and reduce energy spend. A  
 traditional BMS is designed to enable  
 FMs to control central plant operation.  
 However, human intervention, coupled  
 with changing tenant requirements, means  
 critical systems can begin to run outside  
 of the required timeframes, without site  
 management teams necessarily being  
 aware of it. 
 REMOTE MONITORING 
 A straightforward solution is to use retrofit,  
 remote monitoring technology that utilises  
 sensors to provide live HVAC performance  
 data. Sensors can track temperatures,  
 pressures, flow rates, power output,  
 lighting levels and more from within the  
 central plant. This data is sent to a cloudbased  
 platform, where it can be accessed  
 remotely at any time. Facilities managers  
 can leverage the data to identify whether  
 equipment is operating out of line with  
 building occupancy hours. 
 As well as measuring the performance  
 of critical assets within the plant, sensors  
 – integrated into one central system – can  
 provide further touchpoints that solve  
 other issues. For example, air-handling  
 unit filters are normally replaced  
 every four to six months as  
 standard maintenance  
 practice. By placing  
 an airflow sensor  
 either side of  
 the filter, it  
 is possible  
 to measure  
 dust buildup. 
  With  
 the right  
 set points  
 in place,  
 the platform  
 should be  
 able to send a  
 message to the  
 contractor to change  
 the filter when it is actually  
 required.  
 In other words, the building is actively  
 telling stakeholders when something needs  
 to be done, which o ers an opportunity to  
 create new and better models for building  
 maintenance.  
 Similarly, sensors can be used to  
 track bathroom tra ic across multi-let  
 commercial o ices, hospitals or other  
 large sites. Cleaning resources can then  
 be allocated to washrooms with a heavier  
 footfall. 
 Where secondary air-conditioning  
 systems are present within the tenant  
 demise – as is common in commercial  
 properties – ambient room temperatures  
 can be tracked to establish whether these  
 systems are operating out of line with  
 an individual tenant’s occupancy hours.  
 Equipped with these insights, facilities  
 managers can collaborate closely with  
 tenants to ensure air conditioning is shut  
 down correctly. 
 Crucially, any monitoring platform must  
 go further than simply providing live  
 performance data. It must actively inform  
 facilities managers and other stakeholders   
 when there is a problem, and point the  
 way to tangible solutions. It must also  
 be intuitive and easy to use. In this way,  
 it will become more than an instrument  
 to measure asset performance, footfall,  
 lighting or air quality; it will provide  
 actionable insights that non-technical  
 personnel can leverage to create smart,  
 sustainable buildings, as well as the  
 reporting tools necessary to prove success. 
 In summary, facilities managers are the  
 gatekeepers to the success of any remote  
 monitoring tool. Equipped with actionable,  
 intuitive data insights, they can acquire  
 true visibility of the operation of their  
 building and deliver significant change on  
 the ground. By taking ownership of the  
 right technology, FMs can demonstrate how  
 the actions they take directly and positively  
 impact energy consumption, utility spend,  
 service charge, tenant wellbeing and more.  
 FMs can focus their  
 attention on many different  
 areas, but using technology to  
 analyse the performance of the  
 central plant is a cost-effective  
 way to improve operational  
 effi ciency and reduce  
 energy spend.”